Infinite scrolling is very smooth for users. Why is it that SEO is prone to problems? Should the list page be designed with both "How people browse" and "How search discovers" theme visuals at the same time

Infinite scrolling is very smooth for users. Why is it that SEO is prone to problems? The list page should be designed with both "How people browse" and "how search discovers" simultaneously.

Author: JVDS Design Studio Reading time: about 8 min

For users, scrolling down keeps loading smoothly. For search crawlers, they usually do not keep scrolling and clicking "Load More" like real people do. If the subsequent content does not have independent crawlable URLs and links, a beautiful infinite list may make a large number of pages difficult to be discovered.

01 First, distinguish between content browsing and page discovery issues

Infinite scrolling addresses the user's continuous browsing experience. SEO requires that search be able to discover subsequent content through URLs and links. Both can coexist and there is no need to choose one.

Google's current Pagination guide suggests splitting long lists into independently accessible paginated pages and giving each page a unique URL.

02 A stable URL is required for each pagination state

For example? page=2, /page/2/, as long as the structure is stable and the server can directly return the corresponding content, it is fine. When a user enters page=4 from a search or share link, they should actually see that list.

It is not possible to require opening the first page first and then running JavaScript to scroll four times in a row to obtain the same content.

Visual descriptions of truly crawlable <a href> links should be used between pages

03 Use truly crawlable <a href> links between pages

Google's link best practices require that key navigation use anchors with href. Only the onClick button loads the next batch. Search crawlers may not be able to discover subsequent pages through links.

The interface can be visually represented as "Load More", and the corresponding pagination URL and link logic can still be provided at the bottom layer.

04 Do not canonical all pages to the first page

When each page contains different list items, they are not exactly duplicate pages. All canonical to page 1 might make it more difficult for subsequent content to be discovered correctly.

Google's current paginated documentation suggests that each page use its own canonical rather than merging the series into one representative.

05 When the user returns to the list, the position and loaded content need to be restored

The common pain point of infinite scrolling is that when you click into the details, you return to the list and then go back to the top. Especially when browsing to the 100th point, I felt extremely frustrated.

The scroll position, pagination status and filter conditions should be saved. URL statification can also help the browser history work properly.

Infinite scrolling is not suitable for the visual description of all tasks

06 Infinite scrolling is not suitable for all tasks

Social feeds emphasize exploration, and Infinite Scroll is very natural; B2B product catalogues require comparison, positioning and remembering page numbers. Traditional pagination may be more efficient.

"Load More" lies somewhere in between, maintaining a sense of continuity while giving users clear control and a sense of page rhythm.

07 Filtering and sorting should avoid generating infinite URL combinations together with pagination

If a product list has 10 types of filtering, 5 types of sorting, and 100 pages at the same time, the URL combination will expand rapidly. It is necessary to clarify which combinations are worth indexing and which ones only serve users.

Canonical, robots, internal links, and parameter policies should be designed in conjunction with the pagination architecture.

When choosing a solution, simultaneously look at the visual descriptions of user tasks, performance, and search findings

08 When choosing a solution, consider user tasks, performance, and search findings simultaneously

There are no simple answers like "Infinite scrolling is definitely more modern" or "pagination is definitely more SEO-oriented". The correct solution depends on the nature of the content, whether users need to be targeted, the size of the list, and the technical implementation.

As long as the subsequent content has stable accessible pages, crawlable links and correct indexing signals, the front end can continue to provide a smooth continuous loading experience.

09 When filtering URLs, distinguish between "collection pages with search requirements" and pure interactive states

In e-commerce or product catalogs, some combination filters may themselves be stable demands that users would search for, such as "industrial-grade waterproof connectors". Some others are just temporary sorting or multiple-choice states. The two types of URLs should not use the same indexing strategy.

Valuable collection pages can be made into stable, internally linkable, independent copywriting and canonical landing pages. Pure interactive parameters are more suitable for interface state management, avoiding the infinite creation of similar pages.

10 Pagination design cannot only view "previous page/next page" on the desktop.

For mobile, accessible and long list scenarios, it is also necessary to consider the current page status, clickable areas, position retention after returning, and whether filters and page numbers are retained when users return to the list from details.

Search discoverability and user continuous browsing are actually the same architectural issue: each important pagination state should have a stable URL and crawlable links, while not allowing users to lose context due to page slicing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Infinite Scroll cause Google to be completely unable to capture it?

Not necessarily, but subsequent content should be accessible through independent URLs and crawlable links, and cannot rely solely on user scrolling events.

Should the pagination page be canonical to the first page?

It usually shouldn't. Pagination pages containing different list contents should use their respective canonical.

Is the Load More score better than the page?

It depends on the task Exploratory content is suitable for continuous loading, while precise positioning and comparison tasks may be more appropriate for pagination.

Is rel=next/prev required?

Google no longer uses rel=next/prev as the index signal and should not consider it as the current core solution.

How can positions be retained when returning through infinite scrolling?

Save pagination, scrolling and filtering states, and enable browser history and URLs to restore context.

Related ServiceLearn More
Corporate Website Design ServicesView Service Details
Project ConsultationContact JVDS Design Studio
Design and Website Development ArticlesRead More Related Articles
Link copied

From Idea to Launch, We Build It Together

Building useful, scalable digital products around user experience

Tell Us About Your Project