“Build a product similar to this app” is not an executable requirement. A reference product suggests a direction, but does not explain who your users are, how your business rules differ, or which features the first release excludes.
A good PRD exposes disagreement before development instead of teaching the team through bugs and rework after launch.
01 Begin With Why the Product Should Exist
Explain the business context, target users, current problem, phase goal, and success metrics. A useful goal guides tradeoffs—for example, “Enable a new user to complete the first appointment within five minutes,” not “Build an industry-leading platform.”
Also state what is outside the current release so every idea is not assumed to be included.
02 Organize Requirements by Role and Scenario
List users, operations, support, administrators, partners, and other roles with their goals, permissions, and critical tasks. Do not provide one undifferentiated feature list.
For every core scenario, describe the trigger, prerequisites, main steps, exceptions, and completion result.
Recommended App PRD Structure
| Section | Question It Must Answer | Primary Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Context and goals | Why build it, and what will be measured? | Goals, metrics, and non-goals |
| Users and roles | Who uses it, and why do permissions differ? | Personas and role-permission table |
| Scope and priority | What is and is not in the first release? | Feature list and MVP definition |
| Flows and rules | How do tasks proceed and branch? | User flows and business rules |
| Pages and states | What does the user see? | Page inventory and state matrix |
| Data and APIs | What are the fields, sources, and synchronization methods? | Data dictionary and API dependencies |
| Nonfunctional requirements | What are the performance, security, compatibility, and accessibility needs? | Quality standards |
| Acceptance and launch | What qualifies as complete? | Acceptance cases and release plan |
03 Express Business Rules as Testable Conditions
“Eligible users may apply” must define eligibility, data sources, priority, boundary values, and failure feedback. Engineering cannot implement a rule reliably if it exists only in one business stakeholder's head.
Decision tables, state machines, and sample data often explain complex rules better than long paragraphs.
04 Include States in the Page Inventory
In addition to the normal page, cover empty, loading, error, offline, insufficient permission, under review, rejected, and data-conflict states.
Page count is not simply feature count. One critical page can vary substantially by role and state.
05 Do Not Relegate Nonfunctional Requirements to a Final Sentence
Performance, concurrency, logging, security, privacy, compatibility, backups, monitoring, and accessibility affect architecture and cost. Raising them late in development is usually expensive.
Unknown targets can be marked for validation, but should not be omitted entirely.
06 Have Design, Engineering, and QA Review Together
Design examines user paths and information, engineering examines rules, dependencies, and boundaries, and QA examines testability. Joint review uncovers many issues early.
After a requirement changes, update the version and change log. Do not leave new decisions only in group chat.
Frequently Asked Questions
Must a PRD specify every button?
Critical behavior, states, and rules must be clear. Purely visual details can live in design standards to avoid duplicated documentation.
Can a team write a PRD without a product manager?
Yes. A business owner, designer, or project manager can collaborate, provided one person owns scope and decisions.
Can a prototype replace the PRD?
Not completely. A prototype demonstrates interaction, but complex rules, data, permissions, and nonfunctional requirements still need text or tables.
How should uncertain requirements be documented?
Label assumptions, validation needs, and decision deadlines. Use research or prototypes to reduce uncertainty before commitment.
Can the PRD change after completion?
Yes, but record the reason, impact, version, and approver, then reassess schedule and cost.
| Service | View |
|---|---|
| App and mini-program services | View service details |
| Project inquiry | Contact JVDS |
| Design and website articles | View service details |
Link copied
